If the People could again legally grow and use cannabis plants for peaceable use and commerce,
as the Constitution originally guaranteed to us per the 2nd, 4th, 9th, 10th, and 14th Amendments, but cannabis smoke could also remain prohibited under local anti-smoking laws, why wouldn’t Congress simply remove the rhetoric from the Apex Marijuana Law — its malformed, inaccurate federal definition (21
USC 802(16)) — thereby rectifying that law so that it literally upholds our Constitution? The federal definition is the Apex Marijuana Law because the rhetoric is used to convert the honest, accurate definition into an inaccurate definition that has two possible interpretations of the text.
Why is it that for 88 years, Congress has failed to rectify any of the four malformed federal laws that have consistently, but inaccurately, defined marijuana, when the necessary and proper remedy — simply removing its persistent, deceptive, distracting, unnecessary and improper, rhetorical features of racism, duplicity, and circumlocution — has been available since 1937?.
I urge you to support the meaningful, literal reform that rectifies the malformed, inaccurate federal definition of marijuana by simply removing the rhetoric to reveal the honest, accurate definition of marijuana, identify its valid federal controls, circumscribe and disencumber state/local cannabis-use regulations, and literally uphold our Constitution. I urge you to also see my comment to the
DEA, where the rectified definition is presented, at:
https://www.regulations.gov/document/DEA-2024-0059-0001
(this page also details the official misconstruction)
In the Document Comments tab, search for:
lxm-eqse-0vz0 (sounds like a Latin motto)
